What is one strategy a center can use to prevent stagnation among its board members?

Limiting the length of terms each board member serves is a valuable strategy to prevent stagnation within a board. This approach promotes fresh perspectives and invigorates the board's dynamics by ensuring that new members can regularly join and contribute their unique insights and ideas. Term limits can help prevent complacency, as members who know their time on the board is finite may be more motivated to actively participate and engage in meaningful work during their tenure. Furthermore, bringing in new members allows for a diversity of thoughts and experiences, which can lead to more innovative solutions and decisions that align with changing community needs.

While increasing the number of board members could potentially enhance the variety of viewpoints, it does not address the risk of stagnation among existing members, who may still remain in their roles for extended periods. Encouraging members to work without a time limit could lead to the opposite effect, fostering complacency rather than dynamic engagement. Conducting regular performance reviews can provide feedback on individual contributions, but unless the terms are also limited, it doesn’t inherently encourage the fresh input that is essential for preventing stagnation. Thus, establishing term limits is the most effective strategy for ensuring a vibrant and engaged board.